|
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www. 翻譯：風(fēng)聞天下 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處 論壇地址：http://www./bbs/thread-485313-1-1.html NigelTufnel For me the biggest impediment to mobile computing is still the screen size and input methods, not the internet speed. Of course faster speeds don’t hurt, but for me I don’t really get the hype about 5G. Most web pages already load fast on the phone (with The Verge being the exception, there’s a LONG delay now for some reason, even on desktop). 對我來說，移動計算最大的障礙仍然是屏幕尺寸和輸入方式，而不是互聯(lián)網(wǎng)速度。 當(dāng)然，更快的速度不會傷害我，但是對我來說，我真的不需要關(guān)于5 g 的宣傳。 大多數(shù)網(wǎng)頁已經(jīng)能在手機上快速加載了。 Abbott77 5G is not just about mobile devices though. It’s about the future connectivity of cars and many other devices that will be part of the IOT revolution. It will also allow you to ultimately have one internet provider since it will offer speeds not seen on even fiber to the home with ping times that will rival wired connections. Those speeds will also put pressure on ISP’s to up their speed offerings and coverage to homes as they will have legit competition now from many other providers. Most people look at this technology right now through a very thin and myopic lens but it has many larger implications to our connectivity. 5 g 不僅僅是移動設(shè)備。 這關(guān)系到未來汽車和其他設(shè)備的連通性，這將是物聯(lián)網(wǎng)革命的一部分。 它還將允許你最終擁有一家互聯(lián)網(wǎng)供應(yīng)商，因為它將為家庭提供即使是光纖上也達(dá)不到的速度，Ping 時間將與有線連接相匹敵。 這些速度也會給服務(wù)供應(yīng)商帶來壓力，迫使他們提高速度，擴大覆蓋范圍，因為他們將面臨來自其他供應(yīng)商的合法競爭。 現(xiàn)在大多數(shù)人都透過一個非常窄的眼界來看待這項技術(shù)，但是它對我們的連接有許多更大的影響。  LeoMC US means just 33% of all Americans (and has less than 25% of American surface area).The people from Brazil – which are 20% of all Americans – have limited access to internet mainly due to their income; the same goes for the people in Mexico – another 12% of all Americans – that only have lte in the big cities but there are tens of millions Americans that live in the country and hardly have access to 3G.I don’t know the exact number, but I guess not even 60-70% of Americans have access to lte. 美國僅占美洲面積的33%（美國國土面積不到美洲面積的25%）。巴西人占美洲人口的20% ，他們主要由于收入的限制而不能使用互聯(lián)網(wǎng); 墨西哥人也是一樣，他們只有大城市的 lte 網(wǎng)絡(luò)，但是有數(shù)千萬生活在這個國家的美洲人，幾乎沒有3G 網(wǎng)絡(luò)。 我不知道確切的數(shù)字，但我猜甚至不到60-70% 的美洲人使用 lte。 Abbott77 I’m not talking about a whole other continent than me and the person I was replying to lives in. I wasn’t even referring to other countries. A lot of these technologies don’t even need to exist elsewhere to be successful, but they of course will. So what the internet is like in places I don’t live doesn’t effect me and that’s up to those nations to roll out the needed infrastructure. There are more than enough people in the world in population centers that there is no reason to hold back these advancements because there isn’t adequate coverage elsewhere. 我說的不是另一個大陸，而是我和我的回復(fù)對象所在的大陸。 我甚至沒有提到其他國家。 許多這樣的技術(shù)甚至不需要存在于其他地方就能成功，但是它們當(dāng)然會成功。 因此，在我不住的地方，互聯(lián)網(wǎng)是什么樣子并不影響我，這取決于那些國家是否推出所需的基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施。 在世界人口中心有足夠多的人口，沒有理由因為其他地方?jīng)]有足夠的覆蓋面，阻止這些進(jìn)步，。 theeht10 10. But that statistic is bullshit. It’s emblazoned on the verizon billboards but it’s not true. Read the fine print. What they are considering is perhaps where people live, excluding where they may travel and they only talk about a 'signal'. Well, what is a signal? Is it the most minuscule blips on a spectrum analyzer? Or is it something strong enough to make a call with such as a signal strength of -115db or better? You really need to get out more and try making calls and using data on the road. Venture more than a mile beyond the interstate where the other 2% (8 million people) live and report back about that experience. 但是這個統(tǒng)計數(shù)據(jù)是胡扯。 它被裝飾在威瑞森的廣告牌上，但這不是真的。 仔細(xì)閱讀那些小字。 他們考慮的可能是人們居住的地方，不包括他們可能去的地方，他們只談?wù)?信號'。 什么是信號？ 它是頻譜分析儀上最微小的光點嗎？ 或者它的信號強度是否足以打電話? 你真的需要出去走走，試著在路上打電話和使用數(shù)據(jù)。在州際公路以外的地方冒險，其他2%的人（800萬人）居住在那里，并匯報他們的經(jīng)歷。 Abbott77 I live in Colorado. I drive all over this and surrounding states. The only places I don’t have signal are places that are foot traffic only in the middle of the wilderness. My father lives 12 miles in from a highway down a dirt road and I get 4G LTE out in his part of the state. I drive all over Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico. I almost never don’t have signal, and when I don’t I’m in literally the middle of nowhere where there is no infrastructure of any kind, electricity or the like. Having cell service cover 100% of the united states is not necessary. Deer, elk and moose don’t need cell coverage. And boo hoo that 2% of people don’t have service. 我住在科羅拉多州。 我開車經(jīng)過這里和周圍的各個州。 我唯一沒有信號的地方是那些只有在荒野中間才有行人的地方。 我父親住在離高速公路12英里的土路上，而我在他住的地方使用4 g LTE 網(wǎng)絡(luò)。 我開車走遍了懷俄明州，猶他州，新墨西哥州。 我?guī)缀鯊膩頉]有沒有信號，當(dāng)我沒有信號的時候，實際上，我處在一個沒有任何基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施，電力或類似設(shè)施的地方。 手機服務(wù)覆蓋美國100%是沒有必要的。 鹿、麋鹿和駝鹿不需要手機信號覆蓋。 還有2% 的人沒有服務(wù)。  Abbott77 And for that reason I choose to have Verizon… But I have the option to choose a different carrier that has the best coverage, as everyone else does. You get what you pay for. Trotting out one carrier’s coverage map when I have several choices is not making your case in the least. Those other swaths are just elk and deer and the occasional cougar, bear, coyote and wolf. 基于這個原因，我選擇了威瑞森... ... 但是我可以選擇其他覆蓋率最好的運營商，就像其他人一樣。 一分錢一分貨。當(dāng)我有幾個選擇的時候，列出一家運營商的覆蓋圖，根本不代表你的情況。其他的是麋鹿、鹿和偶爾出現(xiàn)的美洲獅、熊、土狼和狼。 foremi And the idea that 5g will be for home internet is a joke. Considering how bad 4G is now and add a much higher frequency and stupid short range I can’t see how it would be viable or even better, especially for those that actually need 4G home internet.So it’s all hype so you can hit your data cap faster downloading who knows what. 5 g 將成為家庭互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的想法是一個笑話。 考慮到現(xiàn)在4 g 是多么糟糕，再加上更高的頻率和愚蠢的短距離，我不知道它如何可行，甚至更好，尤其是那些真正需要4G家庭互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的人。所以這些都是炒作，所以你可以更快地達(dá)到你的數(shù)據(jù)上限，誰知道下載什么。 tb4000 The goal is for it to replace home broadband entirely as far as what they’re implying. I’ve used that Netgear Nighthawk LTE router before and although it was only 4G it was workable due to the ethernet ports available. 其目標(biāo)是完全取代家庭寬帶，就像他們所暗示的那樣。 我以前用過 Netgear nightthawk LTE 路由器，雖然它只有4 g，但由于有以太網(wǎng)端口，它是可用的。 Tex As People in Houston are getting 800 Mbps on Verizon 5g. 休斯頓的人們使用 威瑞森5 g 網(wǎng)絡(luò)可以獲得800mbps 的網(wǎng)速。 Steven Quinn The only problem is customer that Verizon FiOS are in a bigger area and get 1gb and is able to stream in 4k. Anywhere in there house using your cellphone WiFi. Verizon wireless should look at what customer want and not what a company is trying to push onto them. 唯一的問題是，威瑞森的 FiOS 覆蓋更大的區(qū)域，擁有1GB的容量，能夠以4K的速度傳輸，在那里的任何地方都可以使用你的手機WiFi。 威瑞森通信應(yīng)該關(guān)注顧客想要什么，而不是公司試圖強加給他們什么。 JFitzgerald I negotiate against the carriers (wired and wireless) for a living, so I’m no fan of their business practices in general – but – these comments are ridiculous.Have any of you, including the author, actually stopped to think for 15 seconds about the massive technical and financial challenges of creating, from nothing, a 5G network?I’m guessing not.And then in two years all y’all will just take it for granted, or more likely complain it’s not fast enough for some silly game you want to play.I’m so tired of seeing no-nothings complain about people who actually get s(tuff) done. When’s the last time you built anything of value? 我以與運營商(有線和無線)談判為生，所以我通常不喜歡他們的商業(yè)行為——但是——這些評論太荒謬了。你們當(dāng)中有沒有人，包括作者，真的停下來思考過從無到有創(chuàng)建一個5 g 網(wǎng)絡(luò)所面臨的巨大的技術(shù)和財務(wù)挑戰(zhàn)？我猜沒有。然后在兩年內(nèi)，你們所有人都會認(rèn)為這是理所當(dāng)然的，或者更有可能抱怨它不夠快，不足以玩一些你想玩的愚蠢游戲。我已經(jīng)厭倦了看到?jīng)]有人抱怨那些真正完成任務(wù)的人。 你上一次創(chuàng)造有價值的東西是什么時候？ theagentsmith You are torally right, there isn’t much to complain. For me it’s crazy they already started to rollout 5G in 2019.I only find ridiculous to advertise LTE Advanced as 5G. In Italy the networks call it 4.5G which is reasonable.The Verizon phone switching from 4G to 5G I believe it is the way its firmware is designed and not Verizon fault. It will probably stay in idle on 4G to save power and switch to 5G only when in use. 你說得很對，沒什么可抱怨的。 對我來說，他們在2019年就已經(jīng)開始推出5 g 了，這太瘋狂了。 我只是覺得宣傳 LTE Advanced 是5 g 網(wǎng)絡(luò)很荒謬。 在意大利，網(wǎng)絡(luò)稱之為4.5 g，這是合理的。 威瑞森的手機從4 g 切換到5 g 我相信這是它的固件設(shè)計方式，而不是 威瑞森的錯誤。 它可能會切換到4 g 節(jié)省電力，只有在使用切換到5 g 時，。 Abbott77 It absolutely could very soon beat fiber when it comes to downloads and gaming everywhere you are. Of course as we stand 5g network availability is just hype, but hype is what creates demand and pushes competition and thus races to deploy in as many places as possible. 在下載和游戲方面，它絕對可以很快擊敗光纖。 這個觀點是完全正確的， 當(dāng)然，我們站在5 g 網(wǎng)絡(luò)的可用性只是炒作，但炒作是什么創(chuàng)造需求和推動競爭，因此比賽部署在盡可能多的地方。  IntrepiiD You entirely missed the point of the article. The topic isn’t the service — it’s comparing the service to the companies’ stated claims and illuminating the way that they mislead consumers.I think this is easy enough to understand. 你完全沒有抓住這篇文章的要點。 主題不是服務(wù)，而是將服務(wù)與這些公司的陳述進(jìn)行比較，并說明它們誤導(dǎo)消費者的方式。我認(rèn)為這很容易理解。 SC310 As per Intrepid’s statement, it is the media’s job to hold corporations accountable. So this is not complaining, but rather a form of fact-checking. 根據(jù) Intrepid 的聲明，媒體的工作就是讓公司負(fù)起責(zé)任。 所以這不是抱怨，而是一種事實核查。 ? |
|
|
